BIM Execution Plan (BEP) content 📑
A BIM Execution Plan (BEP) isn’t just a formality. It’s the backbone of how teams plan, manage, and deliver project information in line with the Client’s goals & Expectations.
A BIM Execution Plan (BEP) isn’t just some document people pass around at the start of a project.
It’s the game plan that explains how your team will deliver the right information to the right people and at the right time!
Think of it as the project’s digital playbook.
But here’s the truth: many BEPs are rushed, generic, or copy-pasted, and that creates confusion, misalignment, and serious downstream risk.
***This post pulls from real project experience and insights gained during MSc research into BEP compliance & information delivery on UK BIM projects, where it was reviewed what makes a BEP actually work (or not) 👉 Grab your free Research copy here 👉 Download Now (Link to PDF)
Two Types of BEPs: Pre vs Post Appointment
There are 2 x core types of BEPs:
🧩 Pre-appointment BEP – submitted with the bid/tender. Shows how the team plans to meet your information needs
🧩 Post-appointment BEP – submitted after contract award. Shows exactly how the team will do it, with tools, roles, and timing locked in.
***You might have more than one of each if your project involves different Parties at various stages (e.g. RIBA Stage 2 vs RIBA Stage 4). While they can contain similar sections, the purpose is different, the first is to propose, the second is to prove and deliver.
BEP Content That Matters (ISO 19650-2 Clause 5.3.2)
Here’s what a good BEP includes according to ISO 19650, but simplified for real life:
👥 A. Who's doing what?
Who’s in charge of managing each information, and how they’ll stay on top of it.
📦 B. What’s being delivered and when?
How the team will deliver models, documents & data, and what quality checks they’ll do first.
🧱 C. How do models come together?
How files from different teams get combined (aka “federated”) and how often it happens.
📋 D. Who’s responsible for what?
A clear list of who carries out audits, sets up single source of repository platform, but also who owns each model or data set, without confusion & finger-pointing.
🔧 E. How will they do the work?
Which tools, workflows, and checks will be used to get things right the first time.
📚 F. Which standards will they follow?
Any naming rules, file formats, or delivery methods based on Clients’ required standards, or tweaks if needed.
💻 G. What software/hardware will be used?
The actual tools and versions being used, so nobody turns up with a file you can’t open.
⚠️ Why Most BEPs Still Fail?
Many organisations rely on standard BEP templates, which is fine as a starting point. However, if they don’t adjust those templates to respond to the actual Client’s expectations (aka Information Requirements IRs), then the BEP becomes a dictation, not a collaboration.
It tells the client what they’ll get, not what they asked for!
The result? Gaps, duplication, missing data, and friction…
🛡️ What Should Asset / Estate Owners or Their Advisors Do?
✅ Audit & Approve in a timely manner both the Pre-appointment & Post-appointment BEPs = check if they truly respond to their IRs
✅ Don’t settle for basic templates = demand evidence that the team READ the IRs and understands them
✅ Ask to see how methods, tools, roles, and outputs are tailored to your project & your IRs, not a different project or client
✅ Final Thought
A BEP should never just be “submitted & accepted”. It should be audited, questioned, improved & then approved! As it's the plan for how your building’s digital information is created & delivered!
You cannot unlock reliable data, confident decisions, seamless handovers or truly efficient building performance without a solid, well thought out PLAN.
📚 Want to dive deeper into Information Requirements, BIM Management or BIM audits? Explore our #BIMTalk articles 👉www.bimkarela.com/bim-talk
🔍 Need expert support? Check out BIM KARELA’s BIM Tender Support services 👉 www.bimkarela.com/bim-procurement-tender-support